Is Technology Creating a Family Divide?

Nowhere is the influence of accessible knowledge and technology on children’s links more evident than in families. Both controls have added to a growing divide in the usual roles that kids and their parents think a while, at the very time, obscuring those same conversations among parents and children.

Across the preceding two decades, children who, for example, watch television, should receive messages from pop culture telling them that parents are self-centred, childish, inexperienced, and usually clueless.

This divide has increased due to the extended use of technology among kids in many ways. First, children’s immersion in technology, from texting to engaging video games, does by their very essence limit their availability to talk with their parents.

One study discovered that when the working parent reached home after work, his or her kids were so interested in technology that the parent was attended only 30 per cent of the time and was overlooked 50 per cent of the season.

The different study said that family time was not changed when technology was used for school but did hurt family connections when used for cultural purposes. Interestingly, children who spent much time on a successful social networking site meant that they felt less backed by their parents.

Next, as digital immigrants, parents can try to gain knowledge and help with the new technology that their digital-native kids have already learned. This change inability in such an extensive area of children’s lives performs it more challenging for parents to understand the role of teacher and lead in their children’s use of technology. Because of the absence of technological knowledge on the part of many parents, they lack the right, at least in the hearts of their kids, to improve its use.

Due to parents’ fear or anxiety about the use of technology, they may be reluctant to support themselves in their children’s technological lives. Because of their children’s sense of perfection and lack of admiration for parents’ right in these circumstances, children may be reluctant to admit to their parents’ efforts to guide or restrict their usage about technology.

Third, network and mobile technology have given children with confidence in their communications with associates and others. In past ages, if children needed to be in touch with an associate, they had to call them on the house phone, which might be explained by a parent. Thus, parents had the chance to monitor and act as guards for their children’s human beings.

Times have improved. New technology offers children freedom from their parents’ engagement in their social lives, with the use of mobile phones, immediate messaging, and group networking sections.

Of course, kids see this technological divide among themselves and their parents as freedom from over-involvement and invasion on the role of their parents in their professions. Parents, in turn, see it as a lack of attachment to their kids and a failure to have the right oversight, for safety and overall health, of their children’s lives.

At the equivalent time, maybe a bit cynically, children’s time-consuming immersion in technology may also suggest that parents don’t have to worry with treating their children, giving them more liberty.

There is little uncertainty that technology is changing family relations on a day-to-day level. Children are continuously prepared for messaging, monitoring their social media, listening to music, surfing their favourite web sites, and viewing television or videos.

Because of the development of mobile technology, these methods are no long-drawn limited to the house, but rather can happen in cars, at establishments, in fact, wherever there’s a mobile phone signal.

It’s not only the kids who are liable for the increasing divide between parents and their children. Parents can be both guilty of adding to the distance that seems to be growing in houses.

They are usually covered up in their technology, for example, speaking on their telephones, monitoring email, or viewing TV, when people could be speaking to, playing with, or always relating with their kids.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *